Automated Vehicles: Automatically Low Carbon?

Report by Dr Zia Wadud and Professor Jillian Anable
(download report in PDF format)

The UK context for automated and connected cars

Google, Apple, Tesla; all household names which are becoming inextricably linked to the vision of the so-called driverless, autonomous or automated vehicles, holding out the prospect of a revolution in the ways we’ll move around in future. But what are the potential benefits and pitfalls from this revolution in mobility technology?

The Low Carbon Vehicle Partnership (LowCVP) and the Institution of Mechanical Engineers (IMechE) commissioned the Institute for Transport Studies (ITS) investigate the potential impacts of these exciting new technologies and to provide some pointers as to how policy makers may need to respond to make sure they can deliver the greatest benefits in terms of carbon emissions and air quality.

The UK government is keen to maintain its edge in automotive research and technology and, driven by the perceived benefits of connected and automated vehicles (CAVs), aims to be a leader in this area. The Department for Transport (DfT) has identified four key benefits from the adoption of CAVs: (i) creating more free time, (ii) improving safety, (iii) reducing emissions and easing congestion, and (iv) increasing access to vehicles for everyone.i   KPMG estimates the benefits of a high level of automation to be: 25,000 new manufacturing jobs and 320,000 additional new jobs, a reduction of 25,000 accidents saving 2,500 lives and an additional £51bn of economic and social benefit per year by 2030.ii  DfT has clarified that UK legislation already allows the testing of automated vehicles on UK roads and has developed a code of practice for such on-road testing in 2015.

A separate division spanning the DfT and the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS) – the Centre for Connected and Automated Vehicles (CCAV) – has been created to oversee development in this area. The government has announced a £200m fund to develop CAV technology.

Currently, pilot tests are on-going in Bristol, Coventry, Greenwich and Milton Keynes through this fund. Independently, the University of Oxford has developed and demonstrated its own highly automated car.

Summary and policy implications

Automation and smart connectivity in road vehicles is happening apace. How might these elements be combined and integrated into the mobility system to have the most positive impact on energy efficiency and carbon reduction?

The only certainty is that the impacts of automation on energy demand and carbon emissions are highly uncertain:

  • The combination of connectivity, automation plus shared ownership and use has the potential to lead to a substantial reduction in energy use and help accelerate the introduction of low carbon vehicles. However, these energy and carbon benefits are by no means guaranteed. The net impact will ultimately depend on how their introduction spurs further innovation in vehicle and transport system design combined with mobility service provision.
  • The majority of system-wide energy efficiency benefits are   likely to result from high levels of connectivity and coordination between vehicles and infrastructure, not through automation per se. The greatest benefits will come from streamlining traffic flow, eco-routing, optimising network   capacity and reducing congestion. These can materialise even   at the low levels of automation we are already witnessing   today.
  • Lower levels of automation are unlikely to encourage significant   changes in mode choice or car use. At full automation (e.g. ‘driverless’), behavioural responses are extremely uncertain as they are highly dependent on the degree to which the current paradigm of individual private car ownership transitions to new   models of shared access and use: – On the one hand, if the current private ownership model continues, improved comfort, functionality and ‘driveability’ could substantially increase the attraction and use of cars for    private travel, including for some population segments unable or unwilling to drive. This will mean more car trips but also longer ones due to the ability to use car travel time more  productively. – On the other hand, if automation is combined with connectivity as well as shared ownership and use, large  reductions in energy use could result. Innovations in mobility     services (such as ‘mobility on demand’, shared taxis, car clubs) might facilitate lower car ownership, more shared use, greater utilisation and turnover of vehicles and right-sizing by matching   vehicle size to utilisation patterns.

What needs to happen next?

  • Achieving the desired combination of outcomes related to CO2, energy, air quality, safety and accessibility will need careful, synergistic and timely policy design with coordination between the automotive industry, telecommunication industry, transport system operators and mobility service providers.
  • There is a risk that automation could outpace the implementation of the smart connectivity features required for system optimisation. Therefore, establishing data safeguarding and sharing protocols and provisions for smart connectivity at an early stage of deployment is very important for realising the benefits.
  • Demand management will need to be a key component of policy making to mitigate against unsustainable net increases in the use of cars. Policies could include road user charging, low emission zoning and regulating empty running.
  • Regulations or innovative policies (e.g. ‘off-cycle’ credits for carbon intensity improvements achieved over the standard test cycle) may be required to encourage manufacturers to provide efficiency optimising features like automated eco-driving, eco­ routing, platooning or energy saving algorithms in the vehicles.
  • Given the uncertainties, it may be prudent to regulate or incentivise the sales and use of highly and fully automated cars, at least until demand response becomes clearer. Sales could be limited to vulnerable users, mobility or public transport service providers and allowing high and full automation for electric or low-carbon propulsion only.
  • Low-carbon, alternative fuel pumps and charging stations need to be planned and designed for automated, unattended dispensing or charging in order to alleviate the inconveniences of refuelling these vehicles and encourage their uptake.
  • The introduction of automated vehicles in a context of shared car ownership and use will be key to realising energy and carbon benefits. Policy can provide a supportive environment for new mobility services to develop by delivering open data protocols, supporting technology incubation and providing local authorities with resources to enhance skills and offer incentives to local mobility service companies.
  • Technological innovations can fail due to overselling and a failure to address consumer concerns early enough. It cannot be taken for granted that higher levels of automation will automatically win wide public acceptance. Therefore, automated vehicle technology, as well as increased connectivity and data sharing, can only happen after significant public engagement to foster acceptance and positive adoption behaviours.

Automated, autonomous or connected?

Vehicle automation can take place alongside connectivity between: (i) vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) (ii) vehicles and infrastructure (V2I, I2V) (iii) or both (V2X) in order to coordinate traffic. But the more a car is connected or coordinated, the less autonomous it is.

Therefore, the terms autonomous and automated vehicles should not be used interchangeably; rather the key characteristics are automation and connectivity (Fig. 1). While there are synergies between these technologies and they are expected to evolve simultaneously, it is possible for a vehicle to have the characteristics of one without the other (e.g. current vehicles can be ‘connected’ to the traffic stream through GPS and mobile phones, without any automation).

LowCVP fig1

Also, not all automated vehicles are driverless; there are different levels of automation and only Level 5 or full automation is the truly driverless one (Table 1), while Level 4 or High automation also allows driverless mode in certain conditions (e.g. motorway travel).

LowCVP table 1

How can the carbon impacts of automation be measured?

Automation and connectivity can profoundly affect how we travel, how efficiently our vehicle runs and what fuel our vehicle uses for propulsion. These will all affect the net carbon emissions from road transport through the following equation:
LowCVPfig2

Will automation change the way we travel?

Different levels of automation are likely to reduce driving stress, further enhance convenience and safety, allow more productive use of travel time and, potentially, reduce the marginal costs of vehicle use by various degrees.

Low levels of automation will still require driver attention and intervention in driving related tasks and are unlikely to substantially affect travel demand. However, at high or full automation (Levels 4-5) substantially reduced driving stress and demands on the driver are likely to make travel by car substantially more attractive. This, in turn, could encourage a reorganization of residential, employment and leisure location choices, lead to a modal shift from public transit, and increase the number of trips taken by automated cars. Fully automated (Level 5) cars can drop off a passenger in parking constrained city centres and self-park at a distant location resulting in empty running. Full automation could also encourage completely new users to own cars, e.g. the disabled and the elderly, and possibly even those too young to drive now. All of these could substantially increase distance travelled by car (by up to 50-60%) and associated energy consumption. iv

On the other hand, full automation can completely eliminate the driver costs of providing Mobility-on-Demand (MoD) services (e.g. on-demand-taxis, ridesharing) making them an attractive, low-cost and accessible travel option compared to today’s taxis. Increased uptake of MoD (and other Mobility-as-a-Service – MaaS – options such as car clubs) will potentially reduce private car ownership substantially and encourage right-sizing of vehicles to match the utilisation pattern, thus substantially improving energy efficiency (by up to 20-40%).iv However, net travel demand, energy and carbon impacts are still uncertain given the likely increased accessibility and affordability of car travel and some empty running of the fully automated cars between passenger drop-offs and pick-ups. Buses can also benefit from full automation, making them more affordable. Combining automated bus transit with automated MoD services to provide the last-mile solution is another possibility toward an integrated transport solution. All of these could reduce travel demand and energy consumption.

LowCVP tab2

Will cars drive more efficiently?

Automation can enable several energy efficiency  measures to be built-in to individual cars. Smart connectivity, on the other hand, helps streamline the external operating environment through  optimised traffic flow, eco-routing, reductions in traffic accidents and reduced congestion and thus improve network capacity to deliver system-wide efficiency benefits.

While there is obvious synergy between automation and smart connectivity in delivering these system-wide benefits (e.g. accident reduction), smart connectivity and coordination is more important than automation. Likely energy savings are small, however.

Built-in automated eco-driving could improve a car’s energy efficiency by around 5%-20%, despite some adverse network capacity effects.iv  Automation combined with V2V connectivity allows vehicle platooning, whereby a group of vehicles drive close to each other to benefit from reduced aerodynamic drag and improved energy efficiency at high speeds on motorways.

High levels of automation may facilitate changes in vehicle design. The pleasure of quick acceleration during driving will likely diminish if a car drives itself, thereby reducing the need for high-performing engines (through de-emphasised performance and downsizing). Much-improved safety could allow the removal of some of the crash avoidance features in vehicles leading to light-weighting. However, this would require a very high uptake of automation and connectivity so that, in reality, relaxing current safety regulations may only be permitted for geofenced, low-speed city driving. Large improvements in energy efficiency are also possible through right-sizing of vehicles, i.e. by dynamically matching the vehicle size to trip and occupancy type, but this is possible only if there is a move away from traditional car ownership to new mobility services. At the extreme, new single or dual-occupancy geofenced cars/pods might be possible in cities for low occupancy trips.

On the other hand, demand for additional in-car features to facilitate comfort, convenience and productive use of travel time could increase as passengers engage in ‘other’ activities at high and full automation (levels 4-5). In addition, increased safety would make travelling at high speeds safe, and if speed limits are relaxed, could result in an increase in energy use.

LowCVP tab3

Are there synergies between automation and low carbon fuels?

An automated electric vehicle (EV) or fuel cell vehicle (FCV) would still likely cost more than an automated petrol or diesel vehicle and, as such, automation itself does not guarantee a transition to low carbon vehicles. Full automation, however, can help this transition by removing uptake barriers in several ways.

Firstly, fully automated cars could automatically travel to alternative fuel/charging stations and automatically refuel/recharge. This unattended refuelling/recharging would relieve availability constraints at work and home as well as the annoyance of more frequent recharging (EVs) or distant refuelling (FCVs) associated with the early stages of deployment. At the same time, the economics of charging stations would likely improve provided they are designed for automated, unattended dispensing or charging.

Secondly, the ‘high-upfront, but low-per-mile’ cost structure of alternatively fuelled vehicles make them particularly suitable for the intensive use of vehicles within MaaS or MoD operations as higher capital costs will incur shorter payback periods. High utilisation will also likely accelerate fleet turnover and the consequent introduction of new technologies.

Finally, light-weighted fully automated cars could accommodate additional battery-packs without a weight penalty (compared to EVs) in order to extend the range, therefore mitigating the range anxiety barrier associated with EVs.

Smart vehicle-to-vehicle and infrastructure connectivity is not critical to the adoption of low carbon fuels, but intelligent, live information provision about the availability and booking of refuelling/charging facilities will remain beneficial. Another geofencing innovation whereby hybrid vehicles automatically switch to electric operation within a low-emission zone can work without automation as well.

What are the non-energy impacts of automation for society?

One of the major early drivers of automation was vehicle safety. 94% of accidents in the UK can be attributed to human error and automation and connectedness will reduce these accidents substantially,I although complete elimination is unlikely. Large safety benefits can be had through increased connectedness at early automation levels. A number of the previous energy effects,  e.g. vehicle light-weighting, are also directly dependent on improved safety.

Full automation can radically improve the mobility of vulnerable groups such as the elderly and the disabled, who cannot currently drive or drive much less than their desired level. Reduction in the costs of MoD services could afford low-income groups access to cars, improving social inclusion and welfare. For a connected environment, privacy remains a large concern, although autonomous operation may not have this downside.

The potential benefits of congestion reduction in a connected and automated driving environment is immense (around £15b)v. A substantial reduction in congestion are possible through ubiquitous connectivity and coordination, at a rather low level of automation. An average UK driver spends 235 hours behind the wheel, and full automation can allow more productive use of time inside the car as the driver is freed from driving duties, with large economic benefits. However, any increases in the number of cars on the road may negate the congestion benefits to some extent.

Traffic flow improvements and automated driving will reduce emissions of air pollutants and, at higher levels of adoption, the safer and healthier road environment could encourage more walking and cycling. Once again, however, increased attractiveness of car travel without careful planning could mean that walking and cycling levels could fall overall, thus counteracting these public health benefits. Increased use cars, even if largely through shared and ‘on-demand services’, will have profound implications for urban planning. In towns, different parking and drop-off spaces will be needed and potentially increased car distances might lead to satellite towns and villages.vi

Freight vehicles are likely to be one of the earliest adopters of automation. New freight transport and logistic business models will likely develop to take advantage of automation and the associated cost reductions, with knock-on effects on prices and consumer welfare. Among other industries, telecommunications will benefit directly from providing the connectivity features to the automated vehicles, while the insurance industry could see substantial changes.

Automated vehicles: automatically low carbon? Not yet …

Automation and smart connectivity offers considerable potential to improve individual and system-wide vehicle efficiency and reduce net energy demand from road vehicles in the UK. These technologies could therefore accelerate a low-carbon transition in road transport. However, this reduction will not be a direct result of automation, but rather due to automation-facilitated changes in vehicle design, vehicle operations, the provision of mobility services and transport system optimisation.

Most importantly, the majority of the system-wide energy efficiency benefits are likely to result from high levels of connectivity and coordination between vehicles and infrastructure, not through automation per se. If the development of automated vehicles is allowed to outpace the implementation of a connected mobility ecosystem, the dangers of undesirable impacts are significantly increased. It is therefore vital that automated and connected vehicles are introduced in a properly planned environment, with clearly defined responsibilities for different stakeholders, to reap full energy and carbon benefits for society.

Some key policy recommendations to address these early considerations are presented in this briefing.  Arguably the most contentious is the suggestion that automated vehicle sales may have to be deliberately restricted to specific applications and powertrains, and that wider adoption will need to go hand-in-hand with demand management policies to counter rebound travel behaviours. Taking all of this in to account, perhaps the most overarching uncertainty, yet often overlooked, is that of consumer acceptance. Public concerns over safety and data sharing, as well as social norms surrounding private car ownership, may prove to be as vital to address as some of the technical challenges. This all points to the need for considerable breadth and alignment in research, development and demonstration of automated and connected vehicle technology. It also points to a need for coordinated policy design across multiple public policy domains.

References

i Department for Transport (DfT) 2015. The Pathway to Driverless Cars: Summary report and action plan, https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/  attachment_data/file/401562/pathway-driverless-cars-summary.pdf
ii KPMG 2015. Connected and autonomous vehicles; The UK economics opportunity.
A word of caution: the job figures do not include the potential job losses from
commercial drivers for Level 5 automation!
iii SAE (Society for Automotive Engineers) 2014. Automated Driving:
http://www.sae.org/misc/pdfs/automated_driving.pdf
iv Wadud, Z., MacKenzie, D.W., Leiby, P.N., 2016. Help or hindrance? The travel, energy    and carbon impacts of highly automated vehicles’, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 86, pp. 1-18
v CEBR 2014. The future economic and environmental costs of gridlock in 2030,   Centre for Economics and Business Research, London.
vi Correia, G.H.A., Milakis, D., van Arem, B., Hoogendoorn, R. 2016.    Vehicle automation and transport system performance, in Bliemer, M.C.J.,   Mulley, C., Moutou, C.J., (Eds) Handbook of Transport and Urban Planning in the   Developed World, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.

Authors
Dr Zia Wadud, Institute for Transport Studies & Centre for Integrated Energy Research, University of Leeds, Z.Wadud@leeds.ac.uk
Professor Jillian Anable, Institute for Transport Studies, University of Leeds, J.L.Anable@leeds.ac.uk

30th June 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s